After Minister Kassio Nunes Marques requested for views of the method, the vote of the Federal Supreme Court docket (STF) on the revision within the values of the Severance Indemnity Fund (FGTS) was postponed as soon as once more. Consultants imagine that if the revision is permitted, each employee with a proper contract will profit from the correction.
Whereas the Justice of the Peace doesn’t return the method, the Correio heard specialists within the space to information the employee. In any case, is it value ready or ought to we file lawsuits? In keeping with the foundations in drive, the FGTS yields equal to the worth of the reference charge (TR) plus 3% per 12 months, and has been utilized for the reason that Nineties. The TR is at the moment at 0.32% per thirty days, however the index can change, as it’s fashioned by a sequence of variables. Financial savings accounts, for instance, are at the moment remunerated at 0.6% per thirty days.
In keeping with lawyer Ana Maria Cunha, from the Azi & Torres Advogados Associados regulation agency, if the revision is permitted, the vote considerations the substitution of the TR by one other index, such because the IPCA or INPC, since, at the moment, the updating of cash is beneath inflation, bringing monetary losses to staff with a proper contract.
 |
| Ana Maria Cunha remembers that, at the moment, the replace of FGTS values is beneath inflation and financial savings earnings, bringing losses to staff (Picture: Disclosure) |
“On this sense, the results of the STF determination can positively affect the lives of those staff. The expectation is that the STF decides that the applying of the TR is unconstitutional. Lately, in January 2022, the STF already thought of unconstitutional the usage of the TR as an index to replace labor money owed, a precedent that results in imagine in an identical determination on the FGTS”, she says hopefully.
Public safes
Breno Novelli, from Santos Novelli Macedo | Advogados, remembers that the Advocacy Common of the Union introduced an opinion within the sense that there will probably be an affect on the general public coffers of round 661 billion reais, nonetheless, up to now, two votes have already been introduced (André Mendonça and Luís Roberto Barroso) in line that the remuneration of the assure fund can’t be lower than that of the financial savings account.
“Nonetheless, it’s needed to attend for what is known as modulation of results, that’s, if unconstitutionality is asserted, what could be the second of adjusting the correction index and, additionally, what’s the statute of limitations”, he says, highlighting that the TR remained at zero between 2009 and 2013. “This truth drastically decreased the monetary updating of deposits”, he says.
Appearing within the labor, civil and shopper areas, lawyer Philippi Freitas Alves, from Bruno Coni Advogados, believes that, within the subject of hypotheses, if the understanding signed is that of the rapporteur’s vote, to grant the correction of financial savings (TR + 70% (from SELIC) to FGTS linked accounts, that are at the moment restated solely by the TR, there will probably be no main change for the employee, for the reason that restatement will stay a lot decrease than that of inflation, dropping its buying energy over time.
 |
| Philippi Freitas highlights the function of Caixa Econômica Federal and stresses the necessity to evaluate the FGTS as a supporter of housing applications (Picture: Disclosure) |
“It so occurs that the selections which are taken in such a excessive sphere of energy, usually, the political penalties are additionally noticed and what impacts are additionally generated towards the treasury”, he clarifies, noting that if the ministers comply with the vote of the rapporteur Luís Roberto Barroso , there will probably be an enchancment within the correction index, nevertheless it is not going to come near the inflation index for the interval.
Ana Maria Cunha remembers that two ministers have already voted in favor of adjusting the correction index within the FGTS and understood that the correction is made by the identical financial savings index, however that it’s not retroactive (that’s, the change would solely be legitimate for the long run). “There are nonetheless eight votes left”, she factors out.
Field
Philippi Freitas argues that, within the case of the evaluate, it’s essential to take note of the function of Caixa Econômica Federal, which manages the FGTS linked accounts. “Caixa makes use of these deposits to advertise the housing monetary system and, for that goal, makes actual property loans at backed rates of interest resembling Minha Casa Minha Vida”, says the lawyer.
Nonetheless, he remembers that the cash used to advertise the enterprises and actual property financing is from the employee himself, by means of the Assure Fund accounts, at the moment receiving solely the TR as a correction.
“When contracting financing for the acquisition of their property, the employee must pay financial correction, curiosity. Thus, it’s clear that the FGTS linked accounts are way more helpful for banks and builders to have entry to ‘low cost’ cash, to then cost the employee ‘expensively’ on the time of acquisition of the financed property”, denounces the labor lawyer.
Confronted with this situation, Freitas thinks that it’s unlikely that there will probably be any curiosity in correcting the linked FGTS accounts with an index that displays the inflation of the interval and, in actual fact, favors the employee. “If the understanding introduced within the vote of rapporteur Luís Roberto Barroso is adopted by his friends, there will probably be no want for a contribution of assets from the Federal Authorities”, he defends.
Particular person evaluate
With regards to going to courtroom asking for a person evaluate, legal professionals are unanimous in suggesting that events search, as urgently as potential, legal professionals they belief in order that they are often guided on submitting the motion or, then, anticipate the ultimate judgment within the STF.
“In concept, with out finalizing the judgment and its modulation of results, it’s potential to say that there’s a have to file an motion to ensure the correction of values. It is because if the thesis of retroactive correction prevails, that’s, over the previous few years, it’s potential that the courtroom, ultimately, units the publication of the judgment as the ultimate reference for prescription, modulating the consequences solely for individuals who have already filed go well with ”, clarifies Breno.
 |
| Breno Novelli recommends that events search for trusted professionals to information them on the necessity or to not file evaluate actions (Picture: Disclosure) |
The lawyer factors out that in a situation like this, solely those that filed a lawsuit till the publication of the judgment could be entitled to correction variations. “Nonetheless, if the profitable thesis is that of the non-retroactivity of the consequences, learn, that the change of the index would solely be after the publication of the ultimate determination, it’s imagined that Caixa Econômica Federal, supervisor of the fund, will apply routinely, with out that it’s essential to resort to the judiciary”, he concludes.
